News
» Go to news main2024 Smith Shield Moot Results
More than 150 Schulich School of Law students, faculty and guests attended this yearâs Smith Shield Moot, which took place at the Weldon Law Building on October 9, 2024. With a tradition dating back to 1927, Smith Shield competitors are chosen from the top mooters in the compulsory second-year moot.
This yearâs mooters were Alex Harrison, Machel Maxwell, Rachel McMillan, and Anu Sidhu, arguing the case ofÌęSylvia Vaughn v. Derrick Chandler beforeÌęthe Honourable Chief Justice Michael J. Wood, Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; the Honourable Justice Robin C.M. Gogan, Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; and Michelle Kelly, KC, First Vice-President, Nova Scotia Barristersâ Society. Harrison and Maxwell represented the appellant, Derrick Chandler; McMillan and Sidhu represented the respondent, Sylvia Vaughn.
The 2024 competition examined when and how a person should have control over their images and personal information. Schulich Law Assistant Professor Suzie Dunn, acting director of the Law & Technology Institute, served as coachÌęand also drafted the problem.
"I designed this yearâs problem to address some of the challenges we face with protecting our identity and sexual privacy in the digital era,â says Dunn. âOften these types of cases are discussed in the context of intimate sexual partners or celebrities, but I wanted the students to grapple with these issues in a more complex and nuanced fact scenario that reflects the challenges that people, and sex workers in particular, face when engaging in life online. It was also a problem with little established case law, which required the students to be innovative with their arguments.â
According to the case, Ms. Sylvia Vaughn runs a personal camgirl website where she livestreams herself in the nude engaging in sexual behaviours for the people viewing the session. Recently the defendant Mr. Derrick Chandler, another parent from her sonâs school, sent screenshots of her nude images to the principal, teachers, and members of her sonâs school board. After this incident, Mr. Chandler used one of the images he had screenshotted of Ms.ÌęVaughn along with her name on the cover of an e-book he was selling about how to advocate against sexual images online.
Ms. Vaughn commenced an action under theÌęIntimate Images and Cyber-Protection Act, claiming that her intimate images were distributed without her consent. She also brought an action under the tort of appropriation of personality.

From left: the Honourable Chief Justice Michael J. Wood, Alex Hamilton, Rachel McMillan, Anu Sidhu, Machel Maxwell, the Honourable Justice Robin C.M. Gogan, Michelle Kelly, K.C. (Photo by Bruce Bottomley)
The Supreme Moot Court of ±«Óătv was asked to determine if theÌęIntimate Images and Cyber-Protection ActÌęapplied to the defendantâs emails containing the plaintiffâs images, and if the plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her intimate images.
The Court also considered whether the tort of appropriation of personality applied to the book the defendant sold with the plaintiffâs name, image, and story.
âThis yearâs moot team was incredibly strong, they worked together seamlessly and put a lot of hours in supporting each other in their practices. Sensitive topics like this are difficult to discuss and they handled it with such professionalism and poise,â says Dunn. âI was so impressed with them. They will be great lawyers.â
The winners of the 2024 Smith Shield Moot were Rachel McMillan and Anu Sidhu who received the A.S. Pattillo Prize in Advocacy. The runners-up were Alex Harrison and Machel Maxwell who were recognized with the Leonard A. Kitz Prize in Advocacy. David Gouws served as this yearâs alternate.

Rachel McMillan and Anu Sidhu. (Photo by Bruce Bottomley)
âIt was such an honour to be selected to participate, and I accepted a place on the team knowing it would be a challenge that pushed me outside of my comfort zone,â says McMillan. âIt certainly did just that, but that is what makes the experience so rewarding! I feel very proud of the efforts we all made, and very grateful for the opportunity to learn from my classmates and our amazing coach.â
Sidhu says it meant a lot to her to represent Schulich Law alongside her classmates in the Smith Shield.Ìę âA lot of preparation went into the moot and it was incredibly gratifying to see it all pay off. Professor Dunn played a huge role in that preparation, so our success also serves as a testament to her efforts.â
Associate Dean (Academic) Professor Jodi Lazare says the students should be very proud of their performances. âThe mooters, frankly, blew my socks off. I know how hard they worked leading up to the event and that hard work paid off in spades. They were simply excellent." Ìę
Congratulations to the students who took part in this yearâs Smith Shield Moot and thank you to our judges and everyone who contributed to making this year's event a success. We look forward to continuing the tradition next year!
Ìę
Recent News
- Associate Professor Michael Karanicolas ft in "Digital Safety Act seen as unconstitutional, unworkable"
- Associate Professor Michael Karanicolas ft in "How AI will fragment the internet"
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "Legal column: Nova Scotia Supreme Court shuts the door about longstanding fishery dispute"
- Professor Emeritus Phillip Saunders ft in "Int'l law experts denounce "South China Sea Arbitration Award" as politically manipulated, legally void"
- Assistant Professor Suzie Dunn ft in "Canada Has a New Law to Stop Deepfake Nudes. Will It Work?"
- Professor Emerita Jocelyn Downie ft in "âTheyâve left me with nothingâ: Why these Canadians with mental illness say they feel abandoned after MAID decision"
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "Judge says it would be 'cruel and unusual' to send Ontario man who sexually assaulted 12âyearâold sister to jail"
- Professor Emeritus Wayne MacKay ft in "Canadian court publication ban in Quebec militia case raises pressâfreedom concerns"